RSS
Sachin Saxena

The tale of two Webs

Thu, Nov 12, 2009

Sachin Saxena

Web 2.0 vs. Web 1.0 The tale of these two Webs is best told once we understand the meaning, importance and the differences between the following key words for each of the two versions of the web:

* Communities * Content * Communication *Conversations

Communities: Humans are social creature and associating with a ‘tribe’ is a very basic instinct for most of us. We identify ourselves by the places where we were born or live, schools we attended, religious beliefs we practice, professions organization we belong to, companies we work for and a whole slew of such groupings. The groups can be professional or personal and everything in between. Web 1.0 was very informational centric and did not include the community aspect. It did not foster any sense of community, the sense of belonging. So in a sense Web 1.0 did very little to address one of the very basic human nature.

Content: Content is king. However not all kings are created equals, there are emperors, kings and chiefs. Similarly all content is not created equal. In content world, one of the biggest differentiator is content creator. In the world of Web 1.0, because of the inherent cost related to content publishing and distribution, content was locked-up to the few. For example corporate marketing defined all out bound messaging. However, within any industry, groups or company there are leaders and experts, example company CTO or somebody who is an influencer in your group. Their voice and opinions are important to a more targeted group. The third type of content is the idle chat between friends, or a water cooler talk between co-workers, think Facebook. People have various personas, and there is place for all these types of conversation in each person’s life.

Whereas Web 1.0 was mostly for the first persona of content creators, Web 2.0 covers all types of content. In the Web 2.0 world, Wikipedia replaced Encyclopedias, Corporate Wiki replaced the intranet and your LinkedIn post of “Tell your network what you are doing” and IM status replaced the Post-it notes of “Do not disturb” sign outside the cubicle.

Communication: Communication is a two way dialog. In the real world it happens top down, bottom up, and sideways. The first version of the web was top down, talk only as it had no listen capability. In a sense it allowed for a very uninteresting monolog. Web 2.0 is about two way communication, it is about a dialog.

It put people and their communities in the center of all the dialogs. In the first incarnation of the web, this interaction was left to the physical world. Communication is about collaboration and conversations. It is about linking, sharing and interacting. Web 2.0 provided a platform to do all of this.

With so much content and so many conversations and no moderator, the problem of information overload became even more acute. Web 2.0 addressed this problem with a unique ‘wisdom of the crowds’ who provide the moderation by ‘following on twitter’, rating and ranking associated with both the content providers and their content. Comments, bookmarks, ‘..also bought’ (at Amazon), thumbs-up/ down, defined the features that link between relevant content to their communities and allowed them to have a meaningful conversation.

What role has Web 2.0 played in giving rise to the era of blogging and to social networking?

Some of the key Web 2.0 technologies include

*Social Networking site

*Wikis, Blogs & Micro blog

*Mash-ups, Video and Podcast

There are five specific business objectives of most communication — to listen, to talk, to energize, to support, and to embrace. Individuals and companies are using Web 2.0 technologies to communicate with their customers, business partners, employees and their industry groups. Blogging and Social networking are two of the more widely adopted Web 2.0 technologies.

Often time, the users for these tools are viewed as outside of the company, but the audience can very likely be your employees too. Initial adoption of these technologies was done by companies trying to sell directly to the consumer, but companies that have traditionally sold to the Fortune 2000 or to SMB are also starting to adopt ways to bring these tools into their portfolio. The initial adopters of these tools were people who were in the front end of the sales and marketing, but now applications are being developed that are using these tools to support internal and backend processes. Imagine the CEO of a company who wants to engage in ‘chat dialog’ with thousands of employees. Think of the CTO who wants to communicate his product/ architecture vision to the engineers while including constructive feedback from his entire team. These tools are the enablers of these conversations.

So how has the rise of Web 2.0 affected business and changed the way people work.

Web 2.0 is still in its infancy within most organizations. However it has the prospect of changing how marketing departments engages with prospects and customers, how product managers interact with internal and external stake holders, how hiring and recruitment is done, how training is delivered, or how customer support performs their activities today. For example, it is not uncommon that marketing updates their websites once a quarter or every six months with messages that are very carefully crafted but that is totally gibberish to most. It does not have to happen that way. There is no reason why training departments should only conduct instructor led courses that are conducted at prescheduled times that are inconvenient to all and topics that are relevant to few.

Where is the web 2.0 heading

The future is hard to predict. However, some places where Web 2.0 is most like to go next could be..

•Adoption of these tools within the enterprise. Companies shall start using these constructs to reduce the friction and increase the speed in how work is done. Some have labeled this as ‘Enterprise 2.0’. Today integration of the corporate tools such as email, documents etc. is missing. Addressing issues such as security, compliance, would be important before these tools get wider acceptance within enterprise.

•Web 2.0 is very text oriented today. Video, animation, audio, mobile smart phones are some fairly unexplored areas in the web 2.0 world.

•So far Web 2.0 is mostly about free to consumers. Rise of the private club, where members pay to participate or pay for premium services, B2B services is another area that is relatively unexplored.

Popularity: 37% [?]

2 Comments For This Post

  1. Sachin Saxena Sachin Saxena Says:

    Please find below the URL to the story

    http://www.indianexpress.com/news/the-tale-of-two-webs/539669/0
    http://www.financialexpress.com/news/the-tale-of-two-webs/539669/0

  2. Jimmy Says:

    Nice read, thanks for posting up.
    While web 2.0 has definitely opened a lot of doors for marketers with regards to the type of promotion that they can achieve I still stand by the thought that there are some types of business which just don\’t lend themselves to web 2.0 style promotion. This might sound a little archaic with the way things are going but if order for web 2.0 to work as a promotional tool people must be interested in the product or service and there are some areas which just dont have that level of interest. Clever marketing can provoke interest to an extent (getting people interested in an offer for example) but when we go down this route the resources put into web 2.0 often don\’t generate the most promising of leads and are arguably better spent elsewhere.

    Take a boring product sold in the B2B realm such as a mouse mat or desktop pencil sharpener, group these together and you have a stationary supplier. Generating valid and credible web 2.0 interest in this type of niche is not practical or a good use of resource.

Leave a Reply